ArticleScientific reports2024
AdaBoost model for rockburst intensity prediction considering class differences and quantitative characterization of misclassification difference.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating evolutionary algorithms and enhanced-YOLOv8 + for comprehensive apple ripeness prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the resource development gradually into the deep, rock explosion phenomenon is more and more frequent. The suddenness and harmfulness of rockbursts threaten the safe development of underground resources. In order to more accurately predict the possible intensities of rockbursts in specific rock conditions and stress environments, the rock mechanical and stress parameters between different intensities of rockbursts are further explored, an AdaBoost model considering the differences in the hierarchy is established, and a Flash Hill-Climbing method is proposed to optimize the hyperparameters in the classification model. Finally, a misclassification difference index (MCDI) is defined to quantitatively characterize the severity of misclassification. The results show that the accuracy of the Improved AdaBoost model is about 2.3% higher than that of the Normal AdaBoost model, and the Misclassification Difference Index (MCDI) of the Normal AdaBoost model is 05, while the the Improved AdaBoost model is 00. The model can provide a theoretical reference for rockburst prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.