Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science.

Noriyuki Higashide, Takahiro Miura, Yuta Tomokiyo, Kimitaka Asatani, Ichiro Sakata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noriyuki HigashideDepartment of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan. n.higashide@ipr-ctr.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Takahiro MiuraDepartment of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Yuta TomokiyoDepartment of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Kimitaka AsataniDepartment of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Ichiro SakataDepartment of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The creativity of scientists often manifests as localized hot streaks of significant success. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of these influential phases can enhance the effectiveness of support systems and funding allocation, fostering groundbreaking discoveries worthy of accolades. Historically, analyses have suggested that hot streaks occur randomly over time. However, our research, through meticulous examination, reveals that these phases are not flatly distributed but are more frequent at the early and late stages of scientists' careers. Notably, both early and late hot streaks are marked by dense tie collaborations, with the former typically involving close partnerships with particular authors and the latter being characterized by involvement in large-scale projects compared with single-top or ordinary papers. This pattern indicates that mid-career researchers lack both intimate relations and resources to keep big projects, leading to "mid-career pitfall" of consecutive success. This insight holds profound implications for the development of policies and initiatives aimed at bolstering innovative research and discovery.

Identifiers

PMID39548143
PMCPMC11568327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.