ArticleScientific reports2024
Design and performance evaluation of a spiral bar precision weeding mechanism for corn fields.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight deep learning model for multi-plant biotic stress classification and detection for sustainable agriculture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning based agricultural pest monitoring and classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Technology-driven approaches to intelligent mechanical weed control: a systematic review for sustainable weed management.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper focuses on addressing the limitations of existing mechanical weeding methods for corn plants by introducing a spiral tendon-type precision weeding device specifically designed for corn fields. The study encompasses mechanical design and theoretical analysis to determine the overall structure, component parts, application scenarios, operation modes, and working principles of the device. The force applied to the spiral tendon weeding cutter head, a crucial working component of the device, is analyzed, along with its motion characteristics. This analysis allows for the calculation of the force required for the spiral tendon to penetrate the soil, as well as the determination of its trajectory and speed in the soil. The desired motion pattern of the weeding cutter head is considered in determining the contour shape of the inner cylinder track and its cooperation mode with the roller follower. Furthermore, the design and optimization of the circulation groove track are conducted to derive the key parameters of the track. A prototype is then constructed based on the proposed structural design and parameter optimization scheme. Soil bin tests are performed to evaluate the device's performance. The optimal combinations of working parameters are determined as follows: a 70-mm depth of the weeding cutter head into the soil, a movement speed of 80 mm/s, and an output thrust of the electric actuator of 180 N. Under these conditions, the device achieves a weed removal rate exceeding 95% with a 3% wounding rate, demonstrating stable operational performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.