Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A secure and lightweight trust evaluation model for enhancing decision-making in resource-constrained industrial WSNs.

Vinay Pathak, Karan Singh, Tayyab Khan, Mohd Shariq, Shehzad Ashraf Chaudhry, Ashok Kumar Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Underwater Magnetic Sensors Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinay PathakDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIIT Sonepat, Khewra, Haryana, India.
Karan SinghSchool of Computer and Systems Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Tayyab KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIIT Sonepat, Khewra, Haryana, India.
Mohd ShariqDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shehzad Ashraf ChaudhryDepartment of Computer Science & Information Technology, College of Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE. ashraf.shehzad.ch@gmail.com.
Ashok Kumar DasCenter for Security, Theory and Algorithmic Research, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, 500 032, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dependability of nodes in an Industrial Wireless Sensor Network (IWSN) is vital for precise decision-making and the overall functioning of the network. Unreliable nodes have the potential to result in incorrect data, which can undermine the reliability of monitoring and control systems. Inaccurate decision-making in IWSNs can result in operational failures, safety risks, inadequate resource utilization, elevated energy consumption, and susceptibility to security vulnerabilities. Trust models tackle these challenges by recognizing and reducing the impact of unreliable nodes, improving the precision of data, and strengthening the security of the IWSNs. To overcome these challenges, this research work introduces a "Novel approach for Trust Utilization and Reliability Enhancement" (NATURE) in IWSNs. The unique approach employed in proposed NATURE model is distinguished by its multi-level clustered model, which improves attack mitigation, reduces communication overhead, and enhances overall network efficiency. This model is particularly effective in industrial environments where the network structure and the nature of data traffic are highly dynamic. The use of a multifactor trust estimation framework allows NATURE to assess the trustworthiness of SNs based on a comprehensive set of criteria, including behavior patterns, energy consumption, and communication reliability. By operating on multiple levels, NATURE can dynamically adjust trust functions to accurately distinguish between trustworthy and faulty SNs, thereby improving network reliability. Moreover, NATURE employs the temporal decay factor to prioritize recent node behaviors, ensuring that obsolete actions have minimal impact. Additionally, it uses the dynamic adjustment factor to balance the influence of negative interactions, encouraging reliable and responsive trust evaluations. Additionally, NATURE integrates a dynamically adjustable logical time window to enhance monitoring precision and adaptability, outperforming fixed-length windows in anomaly detection. NATURE integrates an Optimal Lead Node Election Algorithm (OLNEA) to improve cluster leader selection process. OLNEA considers network density, link quality, and Lead Node (LN), battery life, ensuring competent data aggregation and load balancing. By periodically selecting robust LNs and seamlessly switching to alternatives, NATURE promotes reliability and mitigates the impact of low LN battery levels. Additionally, NATURE employs a trust-based attacks detection algorithm to fortify IWSN security. This algorithm employs keen methods to verify data integrity, monitor energy levels, and ensure message authenticity, effectively safeguarding the IWSN from malevolent attacks and ensuring the safe transmission of data. Experimental results highlight NATURE's exceptional performance across significant metrics when compared to existing trust schemes. In a WSN of 500 SNs with 30% being malicious, NATURE detects malicious behavior with a 97% accuracy, outperforming other models. Even with 50% malicious SNs, NATURE maintains a high detection accuracy of 91%, again surpassing alternative approaches. Additionally, NATURE significantly reduces energy consumption while achieving efficient throughput rates, underscoring its effectiveness in challenging network conditions.

Identifiers

PMID39548122
PMCPMC11568181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.