ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Immune-oncology targets and therapeutic response of cell pyroptosis-related genes with prognostic implications in neuroblastoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes in neuroblastoma and construction of a prognostic gene signature.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConstruction of a neuroblastoma (NB) prognostic predictive model based on pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) to improve individualized management of NB patients.
methodsThe NB cohort GSE49711 was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and a total of 498 patients were enrolled into the study, which were randomized into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 1:1, with 250 patients in the training set and 248 patients in the test set. A risk prediction model was constructed using the training set, and the GSE49711 cohort and test set were used as internal validation to verify the reliability of the model. Independent predictors associated with prognosis were screened using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses, and risk score models were constructed. Single-cell gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to assess the relationship between PRGs and the tumor immune microenvironment. Nomograms were constructed to extend the clinical usability of the model and the reliability of the model was verified using ROC curves and calibration curves. Protein interaction networks of risk genes were mapped using the String database, and the expression of PRGs in NB cell lines was staged using the CCLE database.
resultsA prognostic model was first developed with the training set: the risk score formula was (- 0.30 × GSDMB) + (- 0.46 × IL-18) + (- 0.21 × NLRP3) + (0.56 × AIM2). Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on the median risk score value. Survival analysis showed that NB patients in the high-risk group had a significantly lower survival rate than those in the low-risk group (P < 0.001). In both the GSE49711 overall cohort and the test cohort, survival analyses showed that patients in the high-risk group had significantly lower survival than those in the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Single-cell gene set enrichment analysis was used to assess the relationship between PRGs and the tumor immune microenvironment. Time-dependent ROC curves assessed the predictive performance of the nomogram in 5-, 7.5-, and 10-year survival with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.843, 0.802 and 0.797, respectively. The calibration curves show good clinical predictive performance for nomograms.
conclusionThe results suggest that PRGs may serve as a novel prognostic marker for NB patients to provide new immunotherapeutic targets for the clinical treatment of NB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.