Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39547999›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Design of optimal concentrations for in vitro cytotoxicity experiments.

Leonie Schürmeyer, Chen Peng, Wiebke Albrecht, Tim Brecklinghaus, Pauline Baur, Jan G Hengstler, Kirsten Schorning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonie SchürmeyerDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. schuermeyer@statistik.tu-dortmund.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9811-3641
Chen PengLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystraße 67, Dortmund, 44139, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Wiebke AlbrechtLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystraße 67, Dortmund, 44139, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Tim BrecklinghausLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystraße 67, Dortmund, 44139, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6650-9166
Pauline BaurDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Jan G Hengstler *Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystraße 67, Dortmund, 44139, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1427-5246
Kirsten Schorning *Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-5486

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 427806116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity experiments are frequently used in toxicology. Although it has been reported that an adequate choice of concentrations improves the quality of the statistical inference substantially, a recent literature review of three major toxicological journals has shown that the corresponding methods are rarely used in toxicological practice. In this study the performance of different sets of concentrations, also called designs, are analyzed, while the overall goal is to promote the advantages of optimal design procedures and to present a user-friendly guideline for planning new cytotoxicity concentration-response experiments. We compare the frequently used log-equidistant design to a Bayesian design, which is constructed by methods of optimum design theory. Using both a dense data set of concentration-cytotoxicity data of valproic acid (VPA) and regular assay data of 104 substances, the performance of the different designs is analyzed in two scenarios, where detailed previous knowledge on VPA is available or not. The results show that it is critical to apply a specific design strategy to determine optimal concentrations for cytotoxicity testing. In particular, the Bayesian design technique with and without incorporating pre-existing knowledge of a specific test substance resulted in a more precise statistical inference than the other used designs. Finally, we present a guideline for upcoming experiments and an accessible user-friendly Shiny app (see http://shiny.statistik.tu-dortmund.de:8080/app/occe ).

Indexed as

Research DesignToxicity TestsBayes TheoremCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansValproic AcidValproic AcidBayesian optimal designConcentration-response experimentsD-optimal designOptimal design

Identifiers

PMID39547999
PMCPMC11748471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.