ArticlePsychological research2024
Effects of global information on the estimation of point-light walker directions.
Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies have shown that observers can accurately estimate the point-light walker (PLW) directions and bias their estimates towards the previous directions, exhibiting a serial dependence. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the inversion of PLWs disrupts their global information and impairs the perception of certain attributes of PLWs. However, it remained unclear whether the global information of PLWs affected the estimation accuracy and serial dependence in the PLW direction estimation. In the current study, participants were presented with either a single or four PLW directions in each trial. In one condition, the PLW was upright; while in another condition, the PLW was inverted. Participants were asked to estimate the direction of the single PLW or the average direction of the four PLWs (i.e., ensemble direction), and each condition was finished by an independent group of participants. The results showed that the estimates of PLW directions were systematically compressed towards the reference direction (0°), showing a reference-attraction bias, and the inversion of the PLWs significantly decreased the estimation accuracy in the ensemble direction perception but not in the single direction perception. Moreover, a stronger serial dependence was observed when four PLWs were presented in previous trials as opposed to just one, and its magnitude was also reduced when the four PLWs were inverted. Therefore, the current study demonstrated the effects of global information on the estimation of PLW directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39547990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.