ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Characterization of poly(A) and poly(T) tail lengths in plasmid DNA by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Poly(A) variants supporting robust transmission stability in bacteria and high protein expression in animals for mRNAMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid advances in messenger RNA (mRNA) technology necessitate effective analytical methods. This study describes the development of a novel in vitro method using ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (IP-RP-LC-HRMS) for assessing the poly(A) and complementary poly(T) tail lengths directly into the DNA template used to manufacture mRNA. Briefly, after the validation of poly(A) tail length in the plasmid by Sanger sequencing, double-stranded DNA fragments containing these tails in the plasmid of interest were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), purified on silica column, and digested with restriction enzymes ClaI and HindIII. Gel or capillary electrophoresis confirmed sample quality and enzymatic digestion efficiency. Subsequently, poly(A) and complementary poly(T) tails were extracted and analyzed by LC-MS to determine their length and heterogeneity at a single-nucleotide resolution. Three DNA templates containing poly(A) tail lengths of 60A-G, 95A, or 108A were studied. LC-MS results correlated well with Sanger sequencing, identifying major populations of 60A-G, 95A, or 108A. Surprisingly, unlike Sanger sequencing, LC-MS analysis revealed minor poly(A) populations with lengths longer or shorter than the theoretically encoded poly(A) tail length. This finding could be explained by (i) the slippage of bacterial DNA polymerase I during plasmid replication in bacterial culture, which occurs on repeat mononucleotide sequences, or (ii) the slippage of Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase during PCR amplification. In conclusion, the method is easy, rapid, and accurate and could replace Sanger sequencing to assess the poly(A) and complementary poly(T) tail lengths in plasmid DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.