ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024
Simultaneous multislice cardiac multimapping based on locally low-rank and sparsity constraints.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough quantitative myocardial T1 and T2 mappings are clinically used to evaluate myocardial diseases, their application needs a minimum of six breath-holds to cover three short-axis slices. The purpose of this work is to simultaneously quantify multislice myocardial T1 and T2 across three short-axis slices in one breath-hold by combining simultaneous multislice (SMS) with multimapping.
methodsAn SMS-Multimapping sequence with multiband radiofrequency (RF) excitations and Cartesian fast low-angle shot readouts was developed for data acquisition. When 3 slices are simultaneously acquired, the acceleration rate is around 12-fold, causing a highly ill-conditioned reconstruction problem. To mitigate image artifacts and noise caused by the ill-conditioning, a reconstruction algorithm based on locally low-rank and sparsity (LLRS) constraints was developed. Validation was performed in phantoms and in vivo imaging, with 20 healthy subjects and 4 patients, regarding regional mean, precision, and scan-rescan reproducibility.
resultsThe phantom imaging shows that SMS-Multimapping with locally low-rank (LLRS) accurately reconstructed multislice T1 and T2 maps despite a six-fold acceleration of scan time. Healthy subject imaging shows that the proposed LLRS algorithm substantially improved image quality relative to split slice-generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition. Compared with modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI), SMS-Multimapping exhibited higher T1 mean (1118 ± 43 ms vs 1190 ± 49 ms, P < 0.01), lower precision (67 ± 17 ms vs 90 ± 17 ms, P < 0.01), and acceptable scan-rescan reproducibility measured by 2 scans 10-min apart (bias = 1.4 ms for MOLLI and 9.0 ms for SMS-Multimapping). Compared with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) T2 mapping, SMS-Multimapping exhibited similar T2 mean (43.5 ± 3.3 ms vs 43.0 ± 3.5 ms, P = 0.64), similar precision (4.9 ± 2.1 ms vs 5.1 ± 1.0 ms, P = 0.93), and acceptable scan-rescan reproducibility (bias = 0.13 ms for bSSFP T2 mapping and 0.55 ms for SMS-Multimapping). In patients, SMS-Multimapping clearly showed the abnormality in a similar fashion as the reference methods despite using only one breath-hold.
conclusionSMS-Multimapping with the proposed LLRS reconstruction can measure multislice T1 and T2 maps in one breath-hold with good accuracy, reasonable precision, and acceptable reproducibility, achieving a six-fold reduction of scan time and an improvement of patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.