ArticleEnvironment international2024
Air pollution exposure in vitrified oocyte donors and male recipient partners in relation to fertilization and embryo quality.
Article in Environment international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic associations between ambient air pollution and transitions of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth among women treated with IVF/ICSI.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- The influence of ambient air pollution during folliculogenesis, endometrial development, and spermatogenesis on fertility: A study among patients using vitrified donor oocyte in vitro fertilization.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Assessing ambient air pollution's effects on birth outcomes: a Scottish IVF cohort study (2010 -2018).Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Article
- Ambient temperature in relation to ovarian reserve and early outcomes following ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ART): Impact of Mitochondrial (Dys)function and Antioxidant Therapy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies on air pollution and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) have focused on couples undergoing autologous IVF, in which it is challenging to disentangle maternal and paternal exposures during gametogenesis. We sought to evaluate the independent associations between air pollution exposure during oogenesis and spermatogenesis on fertilization and embryo quality in non-identified donor oocyte IVF cycles.
methodsOur study included 500 oocyte donors and 915 male recipient partners who contributed 1,095 oocyte thaw cycles (2008-2019). Daily ambient air pollutant exposure was estimated using spatio-temporal models based on residential address and averaged over folliculogenesis (i.e., three months prior to initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation), controlled ovarian stimulation, and spermatogenesis (i.e., 72 days prior to oocyte thaw). We used multivariable generalized estimating equations to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for an interquartile range increase in pollutant exposure in relation to the proportion of oocytes surviving thaw, oocytes fertilized, and usable embryos.
resultsOocyte donors with higher exposure to organic carbon (OC) (aOR = 0.86 95 %CI 0.79,0.94) and particulate matter < 10 µm (aOR = 0.69 95 %CI 0.54,0.90) during folliculogenesis had a lower proportion of oocytes surviving thaw. During ovarian stimulation, higher particulate matter < 2.5 µm (aOR = 0.78 95 %CI 0.66, 0.91), nitrate (aOR = 0.83 95 % CI 0.69,0.99), and OC (aOR = 0.86 95 % CI 0.80,0.93) exposure was associated with a lower proportion of surviving oocytes while nitrogen dioxide (aOR = 1.11 95 %CI 1.00,1.23) and ozone (aOR = 1.19 95 %CI 1.04,1.37) exposure was associated with a higher proportion of fertilized oocytes and usable embryos. Elemental carbon (aOR = 0.93 95 %CI 0.87,1.00) and OC (aOR = 0.95 95 %CI 0.90,1.00) exposure during spermatogenesis was associated with a slightly lower proportion of usable embryos. On the day of oocyte thaw, higher ambient OC at the IVF clinic was associated with lower oocyte survival and higher ozone was associated with lower fertilization.
conclusionsBoth maternal and paternal air pollution exposures during gametogenesis have independent, largely detrimental, effects on early embryological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.