Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39547088›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2024

Air pollution exposure in vitrified oocyte donors and male recipient partners in relation to fertilization and embryo quality.

Sarah LaPointe, Jaqueline C Lee, Zsolt P Nagy, Daniel B Shapiro, Howard H Chang, Yifeng Wang, Armistead G Russell, Heather S Hipp, Audrey J Gaskins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah LaPointeDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Heath, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: sarah.quinones@emory.edu.
Jaqueline C LeeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zsolt P NagyReproductive Biology Associates, Sandy Springs, GA, USA.
Daniel B ShapiroReproductive Biology Associates, Sandy Springs, GA, USA.
Howard H ChangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Heath, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yifeng WangSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Armistead G RussellSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Heather S HippDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Heath, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000424 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2012 to 2012
$6.0M
The Influence of Ambient Air Pollution on Fertility Using a Vitrified Donor Oocyte BankR01ES032446 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2021 to 2024
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000424NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on air pollution and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) have focused on couples undergoing autologous IVF, in which it is challenging to disentangle maternal and paternal exposures during gametogenesis. We sought to evaluate the independent associations between air pollution exposure during oogenesis and spermatogenesis on fertilization and embryo quality in non-identified donor oocyte IVF cycles.

methodsOur study included 500 oocyte donors and 915 male recipient partners who contributed 1,095 oocyte thaw cycles (2008-2019). Daily ambient air pollutant exposure was estimated using spatio-temporal models based on residential address and averaged over folliculogenesis (i.e., three months prior to initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation), controlled ovarian stimulation, and spermatogenesis (i.e., 72 days prior to oocyte thaw). We used multivariable generalized estimating equations to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for an interquartile range increase in pollutant exposure in relation to the proportion of oocytes surviving thaw, oocytes fertilized, and usable embryos.

resultsOocyte donors with higher exposure to organic carbon (OC) (aOR = 0.86 95 %CI 0.79,0.94) and particulate matter < 10 µm (aOR = 0.69 95 %CI 0.54,0.90) during folliculogenesis had a lower proportion of oocytes surviving thaw. During ovarian stimulation, higher particulate matter < 2.5 µm (aOR = 0.78 95 %CI 0.66, 0.91), nitrate (aOR = 0.83 95 % CI 0.69,0.99), and OC (aOR = 0.86 95 % CI 0.80,0.93) exposure was associated with a lower proportion of surviving oocytes while nitrogen dioxide (aOR = 1.11 95 %CI 1.00,1.23) and ozone (aOR = 1.19 95 %CI 1.04,1.37) exposure was associated with a higher proportion of fertilized oocytes and usable embryos. Elemental carbon (aOR = 0.93 95 %CI 0.87,1.00) and OC (aOR = 0.95 95 %CI 0.90,1.00) exposure during spermatogenesis was associated with a slightly lower proportion of usable embryos. On the day of oocyte thaw, higher ambient OC at the IVF clinic was associated with lower oocyte survival and higher ozone was associated with lower fertilization.

conclusionsBoth maternal and paternal air pollution exposures during gametogenesis have independent, largely detrimental, effects on early embryological outcomes.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionFertilization in VitroAdultEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFertilizationHumansMaleOocyte DonationOocytesParticulate MatterVitrificationAir PollutantsParticulate MatterAir PollutionEnvironmental epidemiologyFemaleMaleReproductive outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39547088
PMCPMC11890188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.