ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Serious Games for Serious Pain: Development and Initial Testing of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Game for Patients With Advanced Cancer Pain.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Culturally Tailored Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Black Survivors With Prostate Cancer: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Pilot Testing of a Multicomponent Cancer Pain-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy mHealth App for Patients With Advanced Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCancer-related pain is prevalent among people with advanced cancer. To improve accessibility and engagement with pain-cognitive behavioral therapy (pain-CBT), we developed and tested a serious game hosted within a mobile health intervention that delivers pain-CBT and pharmacologic support. The game focuses on teaching and practicing cognitive restructuring (CR), a central pain-CBT intervention component.
methodsThe pain-CBT game was developed through partnerships with commercial and academic game developers, graphic designers, clinical experts, and patients. Patients with metastatic cancer and pain participated in iterative, semistructured interviews. They described their experience playing each level and reflected on relevance, clarity, usability, and potential changes. Content codes captured patients' suggestions and informed game refinements.
resultsThe final game includes five levels that prompt players to distinguish between adaptive and maladaptive thoughts that are pain- and cancer-specific. The levels vary in objective (eg, hiking and sledding), interaction type (eg, dragging and tapping), and mode of feedback (eg, audio and animation). Fourteen participants reviewed the game. Patients appreciated the pain- and cancer-specific thought examples, with a few noting that the thoughts made them feel less alone. Many stated that the game was fun, relatable, and an engaging distraction. Others noted that the game provided helpful CR practice and prompted reflection. For example, one 40-year-old woman said the game "brings [a thought] to the forefront so you can acknowledge it, and then maybe you could let it go or… do something about it."
conclusionPatients coping with cancer pain found the CR game helpful, enjoyable, and satisfactory. Serious games have the potential to increase engagement while facilitating learning and rehearsal of psychological skills for pain. Future testing will evaluate the efficacy of this serious game.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.