Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546640›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Efficient labeling for fine-tuning chest X-ray bone-suppression networks for pediatric patients.

Weijie Xie, Mengkun Gan, Xiaocong Tan, Mujiao Li, Wei Yang, Wenhui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weijie XieInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mengkun GanInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaocong TanInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mujiao LiInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenhui WangInformation and Data Centre, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Guangzhou Science, Technology and Innovation Commission (CN) SL2024A03J01251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia, a major infectious cause of morbidity and mortality among children worldwide, is typically diagnosed using low-dose pediatric chest X-ray [CXR (chest radiography)]. In pediatric CXR images, bone occlusion leads to a risk of missed diagnosis. Deep learning-based bone-suppression networks relying on training data have enabled considerable progress to be achieved in bone suppression in adult CXR images; however, these networks have poor generalizability to pediatric CXR images because of the lack of labeled pediatric CXR images (i.e., bone images vs. soft-tissue images). Dual-energy subtraction imaging approaches are capable of producing labeled adult CXR images; however, their application is limited because they require specialized equipment, and they are infrequently employed in pediatric settings. Traditional image processing-based models can be used to label pediatric CXR images, but they are semiautomatic and have suboptimal performance. PURPOSE: We developed an efficient labeling approach for fine-tuning pediatric CXR bone-suppression networks capable of automatically suppressing bone structures in CXR images for pediatric patients without the need for specialized equipment and technologist training.

methodsThree steps were employed to label pediatric CXR images and fine-tune pediatric bone-suppression networks: distance transform-based bone-edge detection, traditional image processing-based bone suppression, and fully automated pediatric bone suppression. In distance transform-based bone-edge detection, bone edges were automatically detected by predicting bone-edge distance-transform images, which were then used as inputs in traditional image processing. In this processing, pediatric CXR images were labeled by obtaining bone images through a series of traditional image processing techniques. Finally, the pediatric bone-suppression network was fine-tuned using the labeled pediatric CXR images. This network was initially pretrained on a public adult dataset comprising 240 adult CXR images (A240) and then fine-tuned and validated on 40 pediatric CXR images (P260_40labeled) from our customized dataset (named P260) through five-fold cross-validation; finally, the network was tested on 220 pediatric CXR images (P260_220unlabeled dataset).

resultsThe distance transform-based bone-edge detection network achieved a mean boundary distance of 1.029. Moreover, the traditional image processing-based bone-suppression model obtained bone images exhibiting a relative Weber contrast of 93.0%. Finally, the fully automated pediatric bone-suppression network achieved a relative mean absolute error of 3.38%, a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 35.5 dB, a structural similarity index measure of 98.1%, and a bone-suppression ratio of 90.1% on P260_40labeled.

conclusionsThe proposed fully automated pediatric bone-suppression network, together with the proposed distance transform-based bone-edge detection network, can automatically acquire bone and soft-tissue images solely from CXR images for pediatric patients and has the potential to help diagnose pneumonia in children.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicChildChild, PreschoolDeep LearningHumansbone suppressiondeep learningimage processingpediatric chest X‐ray (CXR)unsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39546640
PMCPMC11788263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.