Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546546›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

EDTNet: A spatial aware attention-based transformer for the pulmonary nodule segmentation.

Dhirendra Prasad Yadav, Bhisham Sharma, Julian L Webber, Abolfazl Mehbodniya, Shivank Chauhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhirendra Prasad YadavDepartment of Computer Engineering & Applications, G.L.A. University, Mathura, India.
Bhisham SharmaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-3504
Julian L WebberDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology (KCST), Doha Area, Kuwait.
Abolfazl MehbodniyaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology (KCST), Doha Area, Kuwait.
Shivank ChauhanDepartment of Computer Engineering & Applications, G.L.A. University, Mathura, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of lung lesions in CT-scan images is essential to diagnose lung cancer. The challenges in lung nodule diagnosis arise due to their small size and diverse nature. We designed a transformer-based model EDTNet (Encoder Decoder Transformer Network) for PNS (Pulmonary Nodule Segmentation). Traditional CNN-based encoders and decoders are hindered by their inability to capture long-range spatial dependencies, leading to suboptimal performance in complex object segmentation tasks. To address the limitation, we leverage an enhanced spatial attention-based Vision Transformer (ViT) as an encoder and decoder in the EDTNet. The EDTNet integrates two successive transformer blocks, a patch-expanding layer, down-sampling layers, and up-sampling layers to improve segmentation capabilities. In addition, ESLA (Enhanced spatial aware local attention) and EGLA (Enhanced global aware local attention) blocks are added to provide attention to the spatial features. Furthermore, skip connections are introduced to facilitate symmetrical interaction between the corresponding encoder and decoder layer, enabling the retrieval of intricate details in the output. The EDTNet performance is compared with several models on DS1 and DS2, including Unet, ResUNet++, U-NET 3+, DeepLabV3+, SegNet, Trans-Unet, and Swin-UNet, demonstrates superior quantitative and visual results. On DS1, the EDTNet achieved 96.27%, 95.81%, 96.15% precision, IoU (Intersection over Union), and DSC (Sorensen-Dice coefficient). Moreover, the model has demonstrated sensitivity, IoU and SDC of 98.84%, 96.06% and 97.85% on DS2.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39546546
PMCPMC11567627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.