ArticlePloS one2024
Sex prediction through machine learning utilizing mandibular condyles, coronoid processes, and sigmoid notches features.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating machine learning and neural network architectures for forensic sex estimation using mandibular ramus and notch features on panoramic radiographs.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Dental age estimation by comparing Demirjian's method and machine learning in Southeast Brazilian youth.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Age estimation of children and adolescents from mandibles using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning in sex estimation using CBCT morphometric measurements of canines.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Sex estimation with parameters of the facial canal by computed tomography using machine learning algorithms and artificial neural networks.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characteristics of the mandible structures have been relevant in anthropological and forensic studies for sex prediction. This study aims to evaluate the coronoid process, condyle, and sigmoid notch patterns in sex prediction through supervised machine learning algorithms. Cephalometric radiographs from 410 dental records of patients were screened to investigate the morphology of the coronoid process, condyle, and sigmoid notch and the Co-Gn distance. The following machine learning algorithms were used to build the predictive models: Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, Multilayer Perceptron Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). A 5-fold cross-validation approach was adopted to validate each model. Metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 Score were calculated for each model, and ROC curves were constructed. All tested variables demonstrated statistical significance (p < 0.10) and were included in the construction of the predictive model. The Co-Gn variable stood out as the most important among the evaluated independent variables, showing greater relevance in three of the four algorithms used in assessing feature importance. In the analysis of the models' performance, the AUC ranged from 0.82 [95% CI = 0.72-0.93] to 0.66 [95% CI = 0.53-0.76] for the test data, and from 0.83 [95% CI = 0.80-0.87] to 0.71 [95% CI = 0.61-0.75] for cross-validation. The precision of the models ranged from 0.83 [95% CI = 0.75-0.91] to 0.68 [95% CI = 0.58-0.78] in the test phase, and from 0.78 [95% CI = 0.74-0.82] to 0.69 [95% CI = 0.65-0.75] in cross-validation. The SVM, KNN, and Gradient Boosting Classifier algorithms stood out with the highest AUC and precision values in both cross-validation and testing. The use of condyle, coronoid process, and sigmoid notch characteristics, in combination with supervised machine learning predictive models, shows potential for contributing to sex prediction based on morphometric bone characteristics, particularly regarding the distance between the condyle and gnathion. However, given the study's limitations, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.