Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546474›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Propagation behavior of coal crack induced by liquid CO2 phase change blasting considering blasting pressure effects.

Shu Ma, Guiming Li, Yongjiang Zhang, Hao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shu MaSchool of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Guiming LiGuizhou Energy Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang, China.
Yongjiang ZhangChina Coal Technology and Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing, China.
Hao LiuCollege of Aerospace Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4190-0836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the crack propagation mechanisms in low-permeability coal seams induced by liquid CO2 phase change blasting under different blasting pressures, this research presents an experimental study conducted on a small liquid CO2 phase change blasting test system. The failure mode, crack morphology, and distribution characteristics of the coal rock model specimens under different liquid CO2 phase change blasting pressure were revealed, analyzing the crack shapes and expansion process. The results show that with increasing blasting pressure, both the number and complexity of cracks significantly increase under liquid CO2 phase change blasting, evolving from simple linear cracks to more complex multi-directional networks. Furthermore, the process of crack generation and expansion during liquid CO2 phase change blasting in coal and rock is controlled by the interaction of shock waves and quasi-static stress resulting from high-pressure CO2 phase transition in the borehole. Cracks form in distinct zones: the broken zone, where shock waves cause severe crushing near the borehole; the crack zone, where quasi-static tensile stress drives crack propagation. Higher confining and CO2 blasting pressures increase crack propagation. The research results offer valuable insights for optimizing blasting design in liquid CO2 phase change fracturing.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideCoalPressureCoal MiningPhase TransitionStress, MechanicalCarbon DioxideCoal

Identifiers

PMID39546474
PMCPMC11567640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.