ArticlePloS one2024
Propagation behavior of coal crack induced by liquid CO2 phase change blasting considering blasting pressure effects.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Borehole pressure response and rock fracture evolution during pipe-assisted high-pressure gas-impact under true-triaxial stress.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Temperature-pressure characteristics of COScientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on Coal Seam Fracturing Based on Hydrodynamic Horizontal Slitting-COACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the crack propagation mechanisms in low-permeability coal seams induced by liquid CO2 phase change blasting under different blasting pressures, this research presents an experimental study conducted on a small liquid CO2 phase change blasting test system. The failure mode, crack morphology, and distribution characteristics of the coal rock model specimens under different liquid CO2 phase change blasting pressure were revealed, analyzing the crack shapes and expansion process. The results show that with increasing blasting pressure, both the number and complexity of cracks significantly increase under liquid CO2 phase change blasting, evolving from simple linear cracks to more complex multi-directional networks. Furthermore, the process of crack generation and expansion during liquid CO2 phase change blasting in coal and rock is controlled by the interaction of shock waves and quasi-static stress resulting from high-pressure CO2 phase transition in the borehole. Cracks form in distinct zones: the broken zone, where shock waves cause severe crushing near the borehole; the crack zone, where quasi-static tensile stress drives crack propagation. Higher confining and CO2 blasting pressures increase crack propagation. The research results offer valuable insights for optimizing blasting design in liquid CO2 phase change fracturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.