Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546469›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2024

Uptake of Aspirin Chemoprevention in Patients With Lynch Syndrome.

Sachi Singhal, Emma D Riggs, Karen J Ruth, Juan Pablo Chavez-Salas, Yana Chertock, Mary B Daly, Michael J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sachi SinghalDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-8130
Emma D RiggsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Karen J RuthBioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Juan Pablo Chavez-SalasDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0009-0006-3380-0858
Yana ChertockDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Mary B DalyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Michael J HallDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-3409

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Aspirin (ASA), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has proven chemopreventive benefits in LS, with the CAPP2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating a 60% relative risk reduction for CRC among participants who adhered to ASA for 2 years or more. This study sought to characterize uptake of ASA/NSAIDs among individuals with LS and to understand factors associated with use.

methodsIndividuals with LS were invited (June 2020-August 2022) to complete a one-time electronic survey about LS screening behaviors, uptake of ASA/NSAIDs, and current/emerging cancer prevention options. Participants were recruited from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Risk Assessment Program Registry and through a research invitation posted to two patient-facing LS advocacy websites.

resultsTwo hundred and ninety-six participants completed the survey including 116 (39.2%) from FCCC and 180 (60.8%) recruited via the Internet, including 14.9% non-US based individuals. Uptake of regular ASA or NSAIDs was modest at 34.8% and was even lower (25.7%) when focusing on individuals taking ASA or NSAIDs solely for chemoprevention of LS. More than half (55%) were taking <100 mg ASA daily. In multivariable modeling, lower perceived threat of LS (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98]), lower

conclusionUptake of ASA/NSAIDs chemoprevention is modest among individuals with LS. Patient perceptions of the pros and cons of ASA, more so than demographic and disease-related factors, were associated with chemoprevention uptake.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinChemopreventionColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirin

Identifiers

PMID39546469
PMCPMC11573245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.