Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

MaskDGNets: Masked-attention guided dynamic graph aggregation network for event extraction.

Guangwei Zhang, Fei Xie, Lei Yu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guangwei ZhangDidi Infinite Technology Development Co., LTD., Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-5714-8817
Fei XieShanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Lei YuShanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering that the traditional deep learning event extraction method ignores the correlation between word features and sequence information, it cannot fully explore the hidden associations between events and events and between events and primary attributes. To solve these problems, we developed a new framework for event extraction called the masked attention-guided dynamic graph aggregation network. On the one hand, to obtain effective word representation and sequence representation, an interaction and complementary relationship are established between word vectors and character vectors. At the same time, a squeeze layer is introduced in the bidirectional independent recurrent unit to model the sentence sequence from both positive and negative directions while retaining the local spatial details to the maximum extent and establishing practical long-term dependencies and rich global context representations. On the other hand, the designed masked attention mechanism can effectively balance the word vector features and sequence semantics and refine these features. The designed dynamic graph aggregation module establishes effective connections between events and events, and between events and essential attributes, strengthens the interactivity and association between them, and realizes feature transfer and aggregation on graph nodes in the neighborhood through dynamic strategies to improve the performance of event extraction. We designed a reconstructed weighted loss function to supervise and adjust each module individually to ensure the optimal feature representation. Finally, the proposed MaskDGNets framework is evaluated on two baseline datasets, DuEE and CCKS2020. It demonstrates its robustness and event extraction performance, with F1 of 81.443% and 87.382%, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerSemantics

Identifiers

PMID39546454
PMCPMC11567535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.