Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546381›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Optimizing multi-omics data imputation with NMF and GAN synergy.

Md Istiaq Ansari, Khandakar Tanvir Ahmed, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Istiaq AnsariDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.
Khandakar Tanvir AhmedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3605-9373

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF-III2246796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIntegrating multiple omics datasets can significantly advance our understanding of disease mechanisms, physiology, and treatment responses. However, a major challenge in multi-omics studies is the disparity in sample sizes across different datasets, which can introduce bias and reduce statistical power. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, OmicsNMF, designed to impute missing omics data and enhance disease phenotype prediction. OmicsNMF integrates Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) with Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF). NMF is a well-established method for uncovering underlying patterns in omics data, while GANs enhance the imputation process by generating realistic data samples. This synergy aims to more effectively address sample size disparity, thereby improving data integration and prediction accuracy.

resultsFor evaluation, we focused on predicting breast cancer subtypes using the imputed data generated by our proposed framework, OmicsNMF. Our results indicate that OmicsNMF consistently outperforms baseline methods. We further assessed the quality of the imputed data through survival analysis, revealing that the imputed omics profiles provide significant prognostic power for both overall survival and disease-free status. Overall, OmicsNMF effectively leverages GANs and NMF to impute missing samples while preserving key biological features. This approach shows potential for advancing precision oncology by improving data integration and analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is available at: https://github.com/compbiolabucf/OmicsNMF.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyFemaleGenomicsHumansMultiomicsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39546381
PMCPMC11639186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.