Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546375›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

LmRaC: a functionally extensible tool for LLM interrogation of user experimental results.

Douglas B Craig, Sorin Drăghici

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas B CraigDepartment of Emergency Medicine Research, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-2793
Sorin DrăghiciDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0786-8377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLarge Language Models (LLMs) have provided spectacular results across a wide variety of domains. However, persistent concerns about hallucination and fabrication of authoritative sources raise serious issues for their integral use in scientific research. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a technique for making data and documents, otherwise unavailable during training, available to the LLM for reasoning tasks. In addition to making dynamic and quantitative data available to the LLM, RAG provides the means by which to carefully control and trace source material, thereby ensuring results are accurate, complete, and authoritative.

resultsHere, we introduce LmRaC, an LLM-based tool capable of answering complex scientific questions in the context of a user's own experimental results. LmRaC allows users to dynamically build domain specific knowledge-bases from PubMed sources (RAGdom). Answers are drawn solely from this RAG with citations to the paragraph level, virtually eliminating any chance of hallucination or fabrication. These answers can then be used to construct an experimental context (RAGexp) that, along with user supplied documents (e.g. design, protocols) and quantitative results, can be used to answer questions about the user's specific experiment. Questions about quantitative experimental data are integral to LmRaC and are supported by a user-defined and functionally extensible REST API server (RAGfun). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Detailed documentation for LmRaC along with a sample REST API server for defining user functions can be found at https://github.com/dbcraig/LmRaC. The LmRaC web application image can be pulled from Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com) as dbcraig/lmrac.

Indexed as

SoftwareComputational BiologyHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalKnowledge BasesPubMed

Identifiers

PMID39546375
PMCPMC11645126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.