ArticleJournal of applied genetics2025
Association of pedigree indexes and genomic breeding values with the performance of Polish Holstein-Friesian cows.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Genomic Random Regression Models for Genetic Parameter Estimations of Female Fertility Traits in Different Parities in German Holsteins.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- AI-enhanced marker-assisted selection concept for the multifunctional honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidea) protein Vitellogenin (Vg).Journal of economic entomology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Pedigree indices (PI) and genomically enhanced breeding values (GBV) of Polish Holstein-Friesian heifers were compared with their future performance. Phenotypes of 15,794 cows from 294 herds were analyzed. The traits evaluated included milk, fat and protein yield, somatic cell score (SCC), stature, overall udder and feet and legs score, heifer conception rate, and longevity. PI and GBV were from official evaluation systems, and performance records were adjusted for non-genetic effects. Correlations between breeding values and adjusted phenotypes were analyzed. Additionally, cows within each herd were divided into quartiles based on their breeding values, and the performance of cows from the top and bottom quartiles was compared. For production traits, similar analyses were conducted separately for high and low milk-producing herds to check for possible genotype by environment interaction. The analyses confirmed the significant correlation between breeding values and cow performance. Incorporating genomic information into PI significantly improved the predictive accuracy for milk, fat, and protein yields, as well as for SCC and stature, with increases ranging from 34 to 64%. Comparisons of cows' performance from the top and bottom quartiles supported these observations for all these traits except protein yield, with differences in performance being 43-92% greater when cows were ranked by GBV instead of PI. In a more productive environment, greater differences in performance were found between the top and bottom quartiles. These findings suggest that Polish breeders can enhance the outcomes of their breeding decisions by using GBV instead of PI. This change offers particular benefits in improving the predictability of future performance for the most economically important traits such as milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, somatic cell score, and stature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.