A Computational Protocol for the Knowledge-Based Assessment and Capture of Pathologies.

We propose that one of the main hurdles in delivering comprehensively informed care results from the challenges surrounding the extraction, representation, and retention of prior clinical experience and basic medical knowledge, as well as its translation into time- and context-informed actionable interventions. While emerging applications in artificial intelligence-based techniques, for example, large language models, offer impressive pattern association capabilities, they often fall short in producing human-readable explanations crucial to their integration into clinical care. Moreover, they require large well-defined and well-integrated data sets that typically conflict with the availability of such data in all but a few areas of medicine, for example, medical imaging and neuroimaging, noninvasive monitoring of bio-electrical activity, etc. In this chapter, we argue that approximate reasoning rooted in the knowledge that is explainable to the human clinician may offer attractive avenues for the introduction of such knowledge in a systematic way that supports formal retention, sharing, and reuse of new clinical and basic medical experience. We outline a conceptual protocol that targets the use of sparse and disparate data of different types and from different sources, seamlessly drawing on our collective experience and that of others. We illustrate the utility of such an integrative approach by applying the latter to the assessment and reconciliation of data from different experimental models, human and animal, in the example use case of a complex health condition.