Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546234›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

A Computational Pipeline for Identifying Gene Regulatory Networks: A Case Study of Response to Exercise.

Nadia Moore, Jeffrey Page, William E Kraus, Kim M Huffman, Gordon Broderick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadia MooreCenter for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jeffrey PageCenter for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
William E KrausDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Kim M HuffmanDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Gordon BroderickCenter for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA. gordon.broderick@usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks are foundational in the control of virtually all biological processes. These networks orchestrate a myriad of cell functions ranging from metabolic rate to the response to a drug or other intervention. The data required to accurately identify these control networks remains very cost and labor intensive typically leading to relatively sparse time course data that is largely incompatible with conventional data-driven model identification techniques. In this work, we combine empirical identification of gene-gene interactions with constraints describing the expected dynamic behavior of the network to infer regulatory dynamics from under-sampled data. We apply this to the identification of gene regulatory subnetworks recruited in groups of subjects participating in several different exercise interventions. Intervention-specific response networks are compared to one another and control actions driving differences are identified. We propose that this approach can extract statistically robust and biologically meaningful insights into gene regulatory dynamics from a dataset consisting of a small number of participants with very limited longitudinal sampling, for example pre- and post- intervention only.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyExerciseGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansComputational modelingConstraint programmingExercise interventionNetwork complexityRegulatory logic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.