Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546232›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Methods for Modeling Early Life Stress in Rodents.

Jamie Y Choe, Harlan P Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie Y ChoeTexas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Harlan P JonesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA. Harlan.Jones@unthsc.edu.

Funding

Texas Minority Health, Research and Outreach (MiHERO)S21MD012472 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI JAMBOOR K. VISHWANATHA · 2017 to 2026
$18.0M
Training in the Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG020494 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI ROBERT Clinton BARBER, NATHALIE SUMIEN · 2002 to 2026
$6.9M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020494NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD012472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models of early life stress/adversity (ELS) have provided a foundation from which our understanding of the psychoneuroimmunology of childhood trauma has expanded over recent decades. Rodent models are a cornerstone of the ELS literature with many studies utilizing paradigms based on early life separation/deprivation protocols and manipulating the cage environment. However, no animal model is perfect. In particular, the lack of standardization across ELS models has led to inconsistent results and raised questions regarding the translational value of common preclinical models. In this chapter, we present an overview of the history of ELS rodent models and discuss considerations relevant to the ongoing efforts to both improve existing models and generate novel paradigms to meet the evolving needs of molecular- and mechanism-based ELS research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalRodentiaStress, PsychologicalAnimalsHumansMiceRatsAnimal modelsEarly adversityNeuroendocrinePsychoneuroimmunologyToxic stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.