Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546230›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Measuring Vaccine Responses in the Multiplex Era.

Kieran Ayling, Kavita Vedhara, Lucy Fairclough

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kieran AylingSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kavita VedharaSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Lucy FaircloughSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. lucy.fairclough@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine studies in psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) provide insight into biopsychosocial interactions and their role in infectious diseases. Methodologies to measure vaccine responses are therefore of critical importance for PNI researchers. In this chapter, traditional and modern immunoassays for the assessment of vaccine responses are discussed, highlighting how multiplex techniques provide researchers with greater capacity and opportunity for novel research relating to vaccine outcomes.

Indexed as

VaccinesHumansImmunoassayPsychoneuroimmunologyVaccinationVaccinesELISAImmunoassayMicroarrayMultiplexVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39546230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.