Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546220›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Identification of potential antigenic proteins and epitopes for the development of a monkeypox virus vaccine: an in silico approach.

Emre Aktaş, Osman Uğur Sezerman, Murat Özer, Kevser Kübra Kırboğa, Ahmet Efe Köseoğlu, Nehir Özdemir Özgentürk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emre AktaşFaculty of Art and Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. emrea@yildiz.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-3402
Osman Uğur SezermanSchool of Medicine, Department of Basic Sciences, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-6783
Murat ÖzerDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Arts, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-6351
Kevser Kübra KırboğaFaculty of Engineering, Bioengineering Department, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Bilecik, 11100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-8860
Ahmet Efe KöseoğluExperimental Eye Research Institute, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-4397
Nehir Özdemir ÖzgentürkFaculty of Art and Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-6303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virus assembly, budding, or surface proteins play important roles such as viral attachment to cells, fusion, and entry into cells. The present study aimed to identify potential antigenic proteins and epitopes that could be used to develop a vaccine or diagnostic assay against the Monkeypox virus (MPXV) which may cause a potential epidemic. To do this, 39 MPXV proteins (including assembly, budding, and surface proteins) were analyzed using an in silico approach. Of these 39 proteins, the F5L virus protein was found to be the best vaccine candidate due to its signal peptide properties, negative GRAVY value, low transmembrane helix content, moderate aliphatic index, large molecular weight, long-estimated half-life, beta wrap motifs, and being stable, soluble, and containing non-allergic features. Moreover, the F5L protein exhibited alpha-helical secondary structures, making it a potential "structural antigen" recognized by antibodies. The other viral protein candidates were A9 and A43, but A9 lacked beta wrap motifs, while A43 had a positive GRAVY value and was insoluble. These two proteins were not as suitable candidates as the F5L protein. The KRVNISLTCL epitope from the F5L protein demonstrated the highest antigen score (2.4684) for MHC-I, while the GRFGYVPYVGYKCI epitope from the A9 protein exhibited the highest antigenicity (1.754) for MHC-II. Both epitopes met the criteria for high antigenicity, non-toxicity, solubility, non-allergenicity, and the presence of cleavage sites. Molecular docking and dynamics (MD) simulations further validated their potential, revealing stable and energetically favorable interactions with MHC molecules. The immunogenicity assessment showed that GRFGYVPYVGYKCI could strongly induce immune responses through both IFN-γ and IL-4 pathways, suggesting its capacity to provoke a balanced Th1 and Th2 response. In contrast, KRVNISLTCL exhibited limited immunostimulatory potential. Overall, these findings lay the groundwork for future vaccine development, indicating that F5L, particularly the GRFGYVPYVGYKCI epitope, may serve as an effective candidate for peptide-based vaccine design against MPXV.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralEpitopesMonkeypox virusVaccine DevelopmentViral ProteinsViral VaccinesComputer SimulationHumansAntigens, ViralEpitopesViral ProteinsViral VaccinesBioinformatics analysesMonkeypox virus (MPXV)Monkeypox virus proteinsPeptide-based vaccine candidates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.