ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025
New sensors for the early detection of clinical deterioration on general wards and beyond - a clinician's perspective.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond the debut: unpacking six years of Hypotension Prediction Index software in intraoperative hypotension prevention - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Pooled it
- Using a Wearable-Based Animated Patient Avatar to Improve Patients' Perception of Vital Signs: Multicenter Computer-Based Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Alert burden when monitoring patients' vital signs continuously at home.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Transforming perioperative care: The current landscape and future trajectory of artificial intelligence in anesthesia-A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- The process of self-care in patients with heart failure after nurse-assisted remote patient monitoring: A qualitative longitudinal approach.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Smart technologies and digital innovations for improving perioperative patient safety: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- Reliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the NIGHTINGALE clinical validation study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Observational
- The use of wearable sensor technology to enhance supportive care in hospitalized palliative patients (Support trial): a prospective preliminary pilot study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection of clinical deterioration could be the next significant step in enhancing patient safety in general hospital wards. Most patients do not deteriorate suddenly; instead, their vital signs are often abnormal or trending towards an abnormal range hours before severe adverse events requiring rescue intervention and/or ICU transfer. To date, at least 10 large clinical studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in severe adverse events when heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation and/or respiratory rate are continuously monitored on medical and surgical wards. Continuous, silent, and automatic monitoring of vital signs also presents the opportunity to eliminate unnecessary spot-checks for stable patients. This could lead to a reduction in nurse workload, while significantly improving patient comfort, sleep quality, and overall satisfaction. Wireless and wearable sensors are particularly valuable, as they make continuous monitoring feasible even for ambulatory patients, raising questions about the future relevance of "stay-in-bed" solutions like capnography, bed sensors, and video-monitoring systems. While the number of wearable sensors and mobile monitoring solutions is rapidly growing, independent validation studies on their sensitivity and specificity in detecting abnormal vital signs in actual patients, rather than healthy volunteers, remain limited. Additionally, further research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using wireless wearables for vital sign monitoring both within hospital wards and at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39546216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.