Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39546208›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

How Have Massively Parallel Sequencing Technologies Furthered Our Understanding of Oncogenesis and Cancer Progression?

Diogo Ann Onuselogu, Saskia Benz, Suparna Mitra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diogo Ann OnuseloguFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Saskia BenzFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Suparna MitraFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.mitra@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing technologies have been a boon to many fields of biological science, including oncology. Cancer is an umbrella term for many diseases featuring abnormal cellular growth due to genetic and epigenetic aberrations. Advances in sequencing technology allow for interrogation of the DNA and RNA of cancer cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment down to a single-base resolution. However, these strides come after a rich history of ground-breaking biological assays, like the discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome in the context of leukemia. Many specific genetic and epigenetic modifications have been implicated in oncogenesis, cancer progression, and response to treatment. Sequencing technologies have also helped to associate populations of bacteria in the microbiome to cancer development and prognosis. However, all this new information, especially when procured via high-throughput methods, comes at the cost of being more computationally and staff-resource intensive. There is also more risk to the privacy of the individuals with sequenced genomes. Notwithstanding, the overall benefit of sequencing technologies can greatly outweigh the risks with careful advancements and continued focus on the goal: helping those affected by cancer via precision medicine. Cancer biology has been and will continue to be elucidated by sequencing innovations in ways unimaginable without it.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeoplasmsDisease ProgressionEpigenesis, GeneticGenomicsHumansCancerModern historyNext-generation sequencingOncogenesisTechnology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.