ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Conservative therapy for lumbar disc herniation].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Lumbar disc herniation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Analysis of influencing factors and predictive performance of lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients with osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Etiology, diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc degeneration: a focus on the mechanism of action of Piezo1 and research perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHerniated discs are a common cause of neurological symptoms that often lead to reduced quality of life. They affect around 20% of 45-56-year olds and, therefore, represent a correspondingly major challenge for healthcare. Conservative therapy methods are usually used as the first treatment option; surgical interventions should only be considered in special symptom constellations.
aimThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative therapy methods in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and to demonstrate their influence on pain reduction and functional improvement. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe current valid AWMF guideline was analyzed, and a systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant information on the conservative treatment of herniated discs. The therapeutic approaches analyzed included physiotherapy, drug treatment, manual therapy and injection therapies. Inclusion criteria covered reviews and meta-analyses from 2019 to 2024.
resultsThe analysis showed that conservative treatment methods led to a significant reduction in pain and improvement in functional abilities in the majority of patients. Not all frequently clinical used forms of therapy have been well proven. DISCUSSION: The results of this study underline the importance of conservative treatment methods as an effective treatment option for herniated discs. In particular, the combination of different treatment approaches can improve treatment outcomes. However, further long-term studies are needed to determine the long-term effects and optimal treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39546019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.