ArticleMicrobial ecology2024
Location Matters: Variations in Cloacal Microbiota Composition of Spatially Separated Freshwater Turtles.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of zoonotic bacteria in wild Australian freshwater turtles.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Hydroelectric Dam May Impact the Microbiome of an Endangered Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica) Population.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Pondering Ponds: Exploring Correlations Between Cloacal Microbiota and Blood Metabolome in Freshwater Turtles.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota of vertebrates is malleable and may be shaped by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Here, the effect that geography has on the cloacal microbiota of two species of Australian freshwater chelonians, eastern longneck turtle (Chelodina longicollis) and Macquarie River turtle (Emydura macquarii), captured from waterbodies with different levels of anthropogenic pressure was investigated. We analysed the microbiota composition, structure and diversity through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. It was hypothesised that animals from less disturbed environments would harbour a more diverse cloacal microbial population. The cloacal microbiotas from 93 turtles (C. longicollis n = 78; E. macquarii n = 15), from five locations, were analysed. For both species, the most predominant phylum was Proteobacteria. Cloacal microbiota alpha diversity varied significantly between the C. longicollis from all locations, but no differences were found for E. macquarii. In C. longicollis, turtles from wetlands within the centre of Melbourne had the lowest alpha diversity metrics, while the highest alpha diversity values were seen in turtles captured from an undisturbed rural waterbody. Beta diversity, obtained by weighted UniFrac distance, showed significant differences between locations of capture for both species of turtles in this investigation. For C. longicollis, 87 biomarkers were identified responsible for explaining differences between locations, and in E. macquarii, 42 biomarkers were found. This is the first study to explore the cloacal microbiota composition of the eastern longneck turtle and gives greater insight into microbial community structures in Macquarie River turtles. Our study demonstrated that cloacal microbiota composition of freshwater turtles was significantly influenced by locality and that disrupted environments may reduce microbial diversity in C. longicollis. Interestingly, we discovered that the effects of location contrasted significantly between species for alpha diversity with differences discovered for C. longicollis but not E. macquarii. However, for both species, beta diversity was notably influenced by habitat type. These results highlight the need to interpret chelonian microbiota data in the context of geography and human disturbance of the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.