Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545940›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024

Non-Innocent Role of Sacrificial Anodes in Electrochemical Nickel-Catalyzed C(sp

Luana Cardinale, Gregory L Beutner, Christopher Y Bemis, Daniel J Weix, Shannon S Stahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep reduction in electrosynthesis.Nature chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luana CardinaleDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Gregory L BeutnerBristol Myers Squibb, Chemical Process Development, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-1404
Christopher Y BemisBristol Myers Squibb, Chemical Process Development, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States.
Daniel J WeixDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-3378
Shannon S StahlDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-7665

Funding

Laser-Enhanced NMR Instrumentation for Chemical and Biochemical ResearchS10OD012245 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAVAGNERO, SILVIA · 2013 to 2013
$1.0M
NIH HHS S10 OD012245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacrificial anodes composed of inexpensive metals such as Zn, Fe, and Mg are widely used to support electrochemical nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling (XEC) reactions, in addition to other reductive electrochemical transformations. Such anodes are appealing because they provide a stable counter-electrode potential and typically avoid interference with the reductive chemistry. The present study outlines the development of an electrochemical Ni-catalyzed XEC reaction that streamlines access to a key pharmaceutical intermediate. Metal ions derived from sacrificial anode oxidation, however, directly contribute to homocoupling and proto-dehalogenation side products that are commonly formed in chemical and electrochemical Ni-catalyzed XEC reactions. Use of a divided cell limits interference by the anode-derived metal ions and supports a high product yield with negligible side product formation, introducing a strategy to overcome one of the main limitations of Ni-catalyzed XEC.

Identifiers

PMID39545940
PMCPMC12012848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.