ArticlePharmacogenomics2024
Estimated clinical utility of multi-gene pharmacogenetic testing in a retrospective cohort of gynecology patients.
Article in Pharmacogenomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the clinical utility of performing multi-gene pharmacogenetic testing on patients undergoing gynecologic surgery/procedure by evaluating the prescribing rate of Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A medications and frequency of drug-gene interactions (DGIs).
methodsThe electronic health record was queried for 76 current procedural terminology codes to identify gynecologic surgeries/procedures that occurred between 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020 in patients with at least one of 152 international classification of disease codes. Prescription data for CPIC level A medications was extracted. Those enrolled in the Penn Medicine Biobank were assessed for DGIs.
resultsThe cohort consisted of 7798 female patients and 682 were in the biobank. Up to 6 years following their surgery or procedure, 80% were ordered ≥1 CPIC level A medication. Over half (54%) of these medications were ordered within 3 days after their surgery or procedure. The most common CPIC level A medications ordered were ibuprofen (57%) and ondansetron (42%). Overall, 7% of the cohort had ≥1 known or predicted DGI with medications they were prescribed.
conclusionMulti-gene pharmacogenetic testing may be beneficial to gynecologic surgery/procedure patients by assisting clinicians with prescribing postoperative analgesics and future medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.