ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Performance evaluation of the Specific Reveal system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures containing Gram-negative pathogens.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Five Assays for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST), Including Disk Diffusion, MIC-Based Systems, and Genotypic Methods: A Prospective Evaluation.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparison of the VITEK REVEAL AST and Accelerate Pheno systems for fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative blood cultures at a large academic health system.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Performance comparison and clinical validation of two rapid direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing approaches for pathogens isolated from positive blood cultures in children.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Advances in the detection of Drug-Resistant bacteria: current trends and innovations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMICEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Real-life evaluation of BioFire® BCID2 and Vitek® REVEALTM for Gram-negative bloodstream infections in critical care.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparison of VITEK REVEAL fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing to antibiotic disk diffusion for gram-negative bloodstream infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid antimicrobial drug administration is crucial for the efficient treatment of sepsis or septic shock, but empirical therapy is limited by the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Thus, rapid and reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is needed to start appropriate antimicrobial drug administration as quickly as possible. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of the Reveal rapid AST system. From February to April 2021, 102 positive blood culture bottles (BCBs) from hospitalized patients with bacteremia caused by Gram-negative bacteria were included in the study. All isolates were tested by the Reveal system directly from the positive BCBs in comparison to the DxM MicroScan WalkAway. Essential agreement (EA) and category agreement (CA) were high with 98.5% and 97.1%, respectively. We also determined the susceptibility of 10 highly resistant CDC & FDA AR strains in duplicate. Here, EA was 99.6% and CA 97.9%. The average time to result by Reveal was 5.4 h ± 1.2 h compared to an average of 16 h by DxM MicroScan WalkAway for clinical strains and 3.8 h ± 1.2 h for more resistant CDC & FDA AR strains. Susceptibility determination with the Reveal rapid AST system directly from positive BCBs is for the frequently represented bug-drug combinations a reliable and accurate approach, meeting the European ISO guideline for the performance of AST systems. Moreover, AST directly from blood cultures performed with the Reveal system saves time when compared to the conventional AST, as no subculturing is needed and time to result is very short.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.