ArticleInternational journal of neural systems2025
Decoding Continuous Tracking Eye Movements from Cortical Spiking Activity.
Article in International journal of neural systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating neural decoding, memristive materials, and adaptive control frameworks for next-generation hippocampal memory prosthetics.iScience · 2026Review
- The Compositional Encoding of Hand-Eye Coordinated Movements for Single Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movements are the primary way primates interact with the world. Understanding how the brain controls the eyes is therefore crucial for improving human health and designing visual rehabilitation devices. However, brain activity is challenging to decipher. Here, we leveraged machine learning algorithms to reconstruct tracking eye movements from high-resolution neuronal recordings. We found that continuous eye position could be decoded with high accuracy using spiking data from only a few dozen cortical neurons. We tested eight decoders and found that neural network models yielded the highest decoding accuracy. Simpler models performed well above chance with a substantial reduction in training time. We measured the impact of data quantity (e.g. number of neurons) and data format (e.g. bin width) on training time, inference time, and generalizability. Training models with more input data improved performance, as expected, but the format of the behavioral output was critical for emphasizing or omitting specific oculomotor events. Our results provide the first demonstration, to our knowledge, of continuously decoded eye movements across a large field of view. Our comprehensive investigation of predictive power and computational efficiency for common decoder architectures provides a much-needed foundation for future work on real-time gaze-tracking devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.