Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545648›Full record

SynthesisFuture microbiology2025

Treatment outcome in patients with spinal neurocysticercosis: a systematic review of published cases and case series.

Ravindra Kumar Garg, Imran Rizvi, Harish Nigam, Shweta Pandey, Ravi Uniyal

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Future microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Vitro Evaluation of Esters of Quinoxaline-1,4-di-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ravindra Kumar GargDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0044-7083
Imran RizviDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Harish NigamDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Shweta PandeyDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Ravi UniyalDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSpinal neurocysticercosis is a rare central nervous system infection caused by the larval form of the

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed across various databases. The review included case reports, case series, and observational studies, and it is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024496957).

resultsThis review analyzed 206 spinal neurocysticercosis cases (from 171 published reports). Symptoms persisted for one week to six months in 49% of cases, and common presentations included paraparesis/quadriparesis (61.7%) and neck/limb/back pain (40.8%). CSF abnormalities were observed in 23.8%. Thoracic involvement was most frequent (39.3%), followed by cervical (27.2%). Neurocysticercosis lesions in other regions, primarily the brain, were found in 18.9%. Differential diagnoses included spinal cord tumors (13.1%). Treatment often involved surgery alone (32%) or with cysticidal drugs (45.6%), with a 91.3% improvement rate, indicating favorable outcomes.

conclusionsSpinal neurocysticercosis primarily affects the thoracic and cervical regions. Most patients respond well to medical therapy; surgery is mainly for progressive neurological deficits.

Indexed as

NeurocysticercosisTaenia soliumAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomealbendazoleCysticercosismyelopathyspinal cordTaenia solium

Identifiers

PMID39545648
PMCPMC11730807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.