ArticlePharmacogenomics2024
Artificial intelligence, medications, pharmacogenomics, and ethics.
Article in Pharmacogenomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- New thinking for the next generation of antimalarials.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics and Epigenetic Regulation Transforming Pediatric Precision Therapeutics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Drug-disease interactions in inflammation: mechanisms, clinical Impact, and future directions.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Pharmacists in modern primary care and management of diseases: an evidence-based perspective on emerging technologies.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Article
- Unveiling Pharmacogenomics Insights into Circular RNAs: Toward Precision Medicine in Cancer Therapy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Anticoagulation Management: Current Landscape and Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are revolutionizing various scientific and clinical disciplines including pharmacogenomics (PGx) by enabling the analysis of complex datasets and the development of predictive models. The integration of AI and ML with PGx has the potential to provide more precise, data-driven insights into new drug targets, drug efficacy, drug selection, and risk of adverse events. While significant effort to develop and validate these tools remain, ongoing advancements in AI technologies, coupled with improvements in data quality and depth is anticipated to drive the transition of these tools into clinical practice and delivery of individualized treatments and improved patient outcomes. The successful development and integration of AI-assisted PGx tools will require careful consideration of ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in research and clinical practice. This paper explores the intersection of PGx with AI, highlighting current research and potential clinical applications, and ELSI including privacy, oversight, patient and provider knowledge and acceptance, and the impact on patient-provider relationship and new roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.