ArticleJournal of global health2024
Heterogeneity in the level of dementia literacy among community doctors in China: A latent profile analysis.
Article in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A literature review of dementia literacy in China: From awareness to action as a driver of the 2024-2030 National Dementia Action Plan.General psychiatry · 2026Review
- Advancing Dementia Care Continuity: The 3A (Awareness, Attitude, Action) Framework.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes towards Alzheimer's disease among adult residents in Jiulongpo, Chongqing, China: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multidimensional perspectives on nurse burnout in China: a cross-sectional study of subgroups and predictors.BMC nursing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the heterogeneity of community doctors based on their knowledge of dementia and the potential factors associated with their dementia literacy. Methods: A total of 1288 community doctors completed the Alzheimer disease knowledge scale (ADKS) in a cross-sectional study conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to explore potential clusters based on responses to the ADKS. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between potential risk factors and the knowledge of community doctors. Results: Community doctors were divided into four clusters according to their knowledge structure (Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 35672.83, Bayesian information criterion (BIC) = 36307.63, adjusted BIC (aBIC) = 35916.91, entropy = 0.814): the severity-focused subgroup (n = 269), the physical issues-focused group (n = 370), the knowledge uncertainty group (n = 191), and the general-focused group (n = 458). Age, education level, type of practice, and professional title were associated with the knowledge structure of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition, the perception that patients seek care in community health centres for physical reasons and community doctors' failure to manage patients with recently identified cognitive impairment were associated with the structures of the ADKS among community doctors (P < 0.05). Conclusions: There is heterogeneity in the level of AD knowledge among community doctors and their demographic characteristics, perceptions, and practices. Further efforts are needed to optimise the knowledge structure of dementia among community health care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.