Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545254›Full record

ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2024

Food Waste Governance Architectures in Europe: Actors, Steering Modes, and Harmonization Trends.

Julia Szulecka, Carrie Bradshaw, Ludovica Principato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia SzuleckaNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) Økernveien 94 Oslo 0579 Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-8832
Carrie BradshawUniversity of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT UK.
Ludovica PrincipatoDepartment of Business Economics Roma Tre University Via Silvio D'Amico, 77 Rome 00145 Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale of food waste across Europe is alarming, and its reduction is becoming an important public policy and governance issue. Sustainable Development Goal Target 12.3 constitutes a global attempt to galvanize system-level reductions. In response, layers of varied regulation and governance at regional and national levels have emerged. This paper studies the types of governance architectures visible across Europe, what policy interventions they bring, and whether responses to the food waste challenge are converging. It looks at four leading food waste jurisdictions-France, England, Norway, and Italy-and investigates the hidden realities obscured by the simplistic division of legislative/top-down versus voluntary/bottom-up approaches. It applies a governance matrix to understand the variety of food waste "steering modes", exploring both the extent to which a regime is hierarchical and/or non-hierarchical and why. Notably, the paper also identifies some general tendencies in food waste governance, including legislative threats, challenges in distributing responsibility across the actors, focus on "low hanging fruits", and an overall harmonization of policy responses in a neoliberal paradigm, with redistribution often pursued as a panacea for the food waste crisis.

Indexed as

food waste governancefood waste lawreduction targetsSDGvoluntary agreements

Identifiers

PMID39545254
PMCPMC11557508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.