Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545248›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

External validation of the Epic sepsis predictive model in 2 county emergency departments.

Daniel G Ostermayer, Benjamin Braunheim, Amit M Mehta, Jeremy Ward, Sara Andrabi, Anwar Mohammad Sirajuddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From patient notes to prognostication: The revolutionary potential of event-based foundation models in orthopaedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel G OstermayerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UT Health at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Benjamin BraunheimDepartment of Health Informatics and Data Science, Harris Health System, Houston, TX 77401, United States.
Amit M MehtaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UT Health at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jeremy WardDepartment of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Sara AndrabiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Anwar Mohammad SirajuddinDepartment of Health Informatics and Data Science, Harris Health System, Houston, TX 77401, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the diagnostic characteristics of the proprietary Epic sepsis predictive model best practice advisory (BPA) alert for physicians in the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: The Epic Sepsis Predictive Model v1.0 (ESPMv1), a proprietary algorithm, is intended to improve provider alerting of patients with a likelihood of developing sepsis. This retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 county EDs from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 evaluated the predictive characteristics of the ESPMv1 for 145 885 encounters. Sepsis was defined according to the Sepsis-3 definition with the onset of sepsis defined as an increase in 2 points on the Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score in patients with the ordering of at least one blood culture and antibiotic. Alerting occurred at an Epic recommended model threshold of 6. Results: The ESPMv1 BPA alert was present in 7183 (4.9%) encounters of which 2253 had sepsis, and not present in 138 702 encounters of which 3180 had sepsis. Within a 6-hour time window for sepsis, the ESPMv1 had a sensitivity of 14.7%, specificity of 95.3%, positive predictive value of 7.6%, and negative predictive value of 97.7%. Providers were alerted with a median lead time of 0 minutes (80% CI, -6 hours and 42 minutes to 12 hours and 0 minutes). Discussion: In our population, the ESPMv1 alerted providers with a median lead time of 0 minutes (80% CI, -6 hours and 42 minutes to 12 hours and 0 minutes) and only alerted providers in half of the cases prior to sepsis occurrence. This suggests that the ESPMv1 alert is adding little assistance to physicians identifying sepsis. With clinicians treating sepsis 50% of the time without an alert, pop-ups can only marginally assist in disease identification. Conclusions: The ESPMv1 provides suboptimal diagnostic characteristics for undifferentiated patients in a county ED.

Identifiers

PMID39545248
PMCPMC11560849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.