Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545201›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

Molecular detection of

Endang Suprihati, Heni Puspitasari, Elly Nur Indasari, Ponasari Galuh, Lucia Tri Suwanti, Mufasirin Mufasirin, Poedji Hastutiek, Boedi Setiawan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Endang SuprihatiDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Heni PuspitasariToxoplasma Study Group, Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Elly Nur IndasariToxoplasma Study Group, Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ponasari GaluhDivision of Clinic Veteriner, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Lucia Tri SuwantiDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Mufasirin MufasirinDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Poedji HastutiekDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Boedi SetiawanDivision of Clinic Veteriner, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Humans and animals who have an acute case of diarrhea can be infected with Aim: This study aims to detect Cryptosporidium spp. infection in wild rats in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. Methods: Through necropsy, a total of 100 wild rats' intestines were sampled for feces. Microscopic observation of the presence of Results: The results showed that 69 samples were positive for containing Conclusion: This study aims to detect Cryptosporidium spp. infection in wild rats in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. The high number of cases of cryptosporidiosis in wild rats has the potential to be a reservoir for the spread of the disease. The Cryptosporidium spp can detected with COWP in 550 bp in wild rats in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumAnimalsFecesIndonesiaRatsRodent DiseasesCOWP geneCryptosporidium spp.Wild ratZiehl-NeelsenZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID39545201
PMCPMC11560268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.