Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39545183›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

Identification of different blood concentration of domestic cat (

Suraida Meisari, Tita Damayanti Lestari, Djoko Legowo, Thomas Valentinus Widiyatno, Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah, Retno Sri Wahjuni, Ratna Damayanti, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses, Ricadonna Raissa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suraida MeisariCenter for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Bogor, Indonesia.
Tita Damayanti LestariDivision of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Djoko LegowoDivision of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Thomas Valentinus WidiyatnoDivision of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Eka Pramyrtha HestianahDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Retno Sri WahjuniDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ratna DamayantiDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Aswin Rafif KhairullahResearch Center for Veterinary Science, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia.
Ikechukwu Benjamin MosesDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ricadonna RaissaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cases of cruelty can occur in wild animal, livestock, and pet animal. Cruelty to cats choose to be the background of this research because many cases of cruelty to cats have not been reported although the cases are still high. Aim: The aim of this research was to know how much dilution of cat blood can still be detected by Leucomalachite Green (LMG) and Takayama reagent. Methods: Three samples of domestic cat blood were diluted with ratios 1:10; 1:100; 1:1,000; 1:10,000; and 1:100,000. Bloodstain is made by dropping each blood dilution on the filter paper for the LMG test and on the object glass for the Takayama test. Bloodstain for the LMG test was done with ten repetitions from each sample and Duplo for the Takayama test. Positive results from the LMG test are presented as a bluish-green discoloration in stains. A positive result from the Takayama test is the formation of hemochromogen crystals under a microscope with 400× magnification. Results: Based on this research, cat bloodstain can be detected with LMG reagent until 1:40,000 dilution, while Takayama reagent only can detect cat bloodstain until 1:1,000. Conclusion: LMG and Takayama reagents are reagents that are often used in human blood spot testing. If there is a case of violence against cats and other animals, these two reagents can be relied on to help with the proof process.

Indexed as

Blood StainsRosaniline DyesAnimalsCatsleucomalachite greenRosaniline DyesBloodstainCatLeucomalachite GreenRGB valueTakayama

Identifiers

PMID39545183
PMCPMC11560260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.