Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Post Using Various Post Space Irrigation Treatments.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Chitosan nanoparticles used via different irrigation techniques: Syringe and laser activated irrigation via Er: YAG laser on smear layer and pushout bond strength: An In Vitro SEM assessment.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025
   Article
2. Evaluating the penetration, interfacial adaptation, and push-out bond strength of four bioceramic-based root canal sealers.BMC oral health · 2025
   Article
3. Effect of Er: YAG laser, phthalocyanine activated photodynamic therapy, and bioactive glass nanoparticles on smear layer removal and push out bond strength of quartz fiber posts to canal dentin: a SEM assessment.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as