ArticleThe journal of retirement2024
Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Retirement Knowledge Scale (RKS).
Article in The journal of retirement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Retirement Knowledge Scale (RKS) consists of 10 questions that assess three aspects of financial planning for retirement: reflection about retirement plans, engagement with information on retirement preparedness, and evaluation of retirement preparedness. The RKS was administered to 1350 adults 50 and older in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) as an experimental module for the 2020 wave along with the "Big Three" questions of financial literacy that assess knowledge about inflation, interest rate, and risk. Results of the study provide support for the reliability of the RKS scales in the full sample and separately for non-retired and retired adults. We also find support for the construct validity of the RKS based on its associations with the Financial Literacy Score (i.e. Big Three questions), retirement status, sociodemographic characteristics, financial outcomes and planning horizons, personality traits, and satisfaction with life and other related outcomes. We find that better RKS scores are correlated with higher objective financial knowledge and levels of education, being retired, better financial outcomes (value of financial assets, probability of leaving a 10,000 bequest, and IRA/Keogh, stock, checking and CD account balances), longer financial planning horizon, being extrovert, open and conscientious, and higher levels of satisfaction with life, income, personal financial situation, and health. We also conduct a multiple regression analysis that provides support for the validity of the RKS. The RKS is useful as it provides new information about knowledge gaps in financial planning for retirement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.