ArticleAIP conference proceedings2024
Whole Stimulus DPOAE Analysis.
Article in AIP conference proceedings, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) offer great potential for hearing diagnosis, but are complicated by the interaction of components generated by different mechanisms. Separation of these components from DPOAE measurements may allow conclusions to be drawn about the functionality of these separate mechanisms of a cochlear. However, the signal processing methods for performing this separation are imperfect. Existing methods are based on time windowing of DPOAE generated from frequency sweep stimuli. This paper presents a method in which the entire spectra of both distortion (D) and reflection (R) components are simultaneously estimated. This approach has several advantages. Firstly, the method removes the need for a compromise between frequency precision and signal to noise ratio. Secondly, the method can be made to include models of the stimulus signals, so that the stimulus does not strongly interfere with the estimation process. Thirdly, the method can be arranged to make efficient use of data that has been corrupted by measurement artefacts. Fourthly, the method can be easily adapted to track DPOAEs that are changing in response to chemical or acoustic treatments. The basic modelling assumptions made are that the sum of R and D measurements can be represented as the sum of convolutions with the stimulus signal, the frequency representation of the D component is more smooth than the R component, and that a reasonable estimate of the noise level in the signal is available. These assumptions are combined into a linear convex problem. In this paper we compare the proposed approach with three other methods. While it is not superior to the earlier methods at every frequency, it does offer some improvement, particularly with regards reducing the contamination of D by R.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.