Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544911›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024

More than microglia: myeloid cells and biomarkers in neurodegeneration.

Eleftheria Kodosaki, Rosie Bell, Aitana Sogorb-Esteve, Katharine Wiltshire, Henrik Zetterberg, Amanda Heslegrave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eleftheria KodosakiDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Rosie BellDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Aitana Sogorb-EsteveUK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Katharine WiltshireDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda HeslegraveDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of myeloid cells (granulocytes and monocytes) in neurodegeneration and neurodegenerative disorders (NDD) is indisputable. Here we discuss the roles of myeloid cells in neurodegenerative diseases, and the recent advances in biofluid and imaging myeloid biomarker research with a focus on methods that can be used in the clinic. For this review, evidence from three neurodegenerative diseases will be included, Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). We discuss the potential for these biomarkers to be used in humans with suspected NDD as prognostic, diagnostic, or monitoring tools, identify knowledge gaps in literature, and propose potential approaches to further elucidate the role of myeloid cells in neurodegeneration and better utilize myeloid biomarkers in the understanding and treatment of NDD.

Indexed as

biomarker standardizationbiomarker utilitymicrogliamyeloid biomarkersmyeloid cellsneurodegenerationneuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID39544911
PMCPMC11560917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.