ReviewFrontiers in surgery2024
Analyzing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review enhanced by artificial intelligence.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative carbohydrate loading in elective colorectal surgery: postoperative complications and outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic right hemicolectomy: insights from a single centre.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Targeting β-Adrenergic Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of β-Blockers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Rethinking surgical strategy for margin-positive only T1 colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and transforming cancer care.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- EUS-guided drainage for pelvic abscesses: a Chinese single-center two-year follow-up study highlighting clinical outcomes.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Bridging Oncological Safety and Aesthetic Excellence in the Era of Precision Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Predictive Value of Clinical and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Emergency Colic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Severe Postoperative Complications After Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Octogenarians: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Body mass index-defined overweight (but not obese) correlates with better postoperative prognosis in colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Cancer-Related Malnutrition and Oxidative Stress in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology and Postoperative Outcomes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Significance of Naples prognostic score for postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery.Surgery today · 2025Article
- How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- The Determinants of Long-Term Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer stands as a predominant cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite progressive strides in surgical methodologies, the specter of postoperative complications is very large, significantly impacting both morbidity and mortality rates. This review aims to meticulously examine existing scholarly works to gauge the prevalence, severity, and therapeutic approaches to postoperative complications arising from colorectal cancer surgeries. Methods: Employing a systematic approach, this study reviewed 135 peer-reviewed publications from the period of 2000-2023. The corpus was organized into categories reflective of the postoperative complications discussed: anastomotic leakage, port-site metastases, small bowel adhesions and obstructions, thrombosis, ileus, postoperative infections, urinary dysfunctions, and cardiovascular dysfunctions. Advanced artificial intelligence tools were leveraged for in-depth literature searches and semantic analyses to pinpoint research lacunae. Results: The analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections garnered the majority of academic focus, representing 35% and 25% of the studies, respectively. Conversely, port-site metastases and cardiovascular dysfunctions were less frequently examined, accounting for merely 5% and 3% of the literature. The reviewed studies indicate a disparity in the reported prevalence rates of each complication, oscillating between 3% and 20%. Furthermore, the review identified a dearth of evidence-based management protocols, underscored by a pronounced heterogeneity in treatment guidelines. Conclusions: The literature is replete with analyses on anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections; however, there exists a glaring scarcity of exhaustive research on other postoperative complications. This review emphasizes the pressing need for uniform treatment guidelines and spotlights areas in dire need of further research, aiming at the comprehensive enhancement of patient outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.