Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544841›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2024

Analyzing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review enhanced by artificial intelligence.

Dan Andras, Angela Madalina Lazar, Dragoş Crețoiu, Florian Berghea, Dragos Eugen Georgescu, Valentin Grigorean, Simona Raluca Iacoban, Bogdan Mastalier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dan Andras *Colentina General Surgery Clinic, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Angela Madalina Lazar *Colentina General Surgery Clinic, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Dragoş CrețoiuDepartment of Genetics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Florian BergheaRheumatology Clinic, St Mary Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Dragos Eugen GeorgescuSt Bagdasar General Surgery Clinic, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Valentin GrigoreanProf. I. Juvara General Surgery Clinic, Dr. I. Cantacuzino Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Simona Raluca IacobanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Polizu Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan MastalierColentina General Surgery Clinic, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer stands as a predominant cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite progressive strides in surgical methodologies, the specter of postoperative complications is very large, significantly impacting both morbidity and mortality rates. This review aims to meticulously examine existing scholarly works to gauge the prevalence, severity, and therapeutic approaches to postoperative complications arising from colorectal cancer surgeries. Methods: Employing a systematic approach, this study reviewed 135 peer-reviewed publications from the period of 2000-2023. The corpus was organized into categories reflective of the postoperative complications discussed: anastomotic leakage, port-site metastases, small bowel adhesions and obstructions, thrombosis, ileus, postoperative infections, urinary dysfunctions, and cardiovascular dysfunctions. Advanced artificial intelligence tools were leveraged for in-depth literature searches and semantic analyses to pinpoint research lacunae. Results: The analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections garnered the majority of academic focus, representing 35% and 25% of the studies, respectively. Conversely, port-site metastases and cardiovascular dysfunctions were less frequently examined, accounting for merely 5% and 3% of the literature. The reviewed studies indicate a disparity in the reported prevalence rates of each complication, oscillating between 3% and 20%. Furthermore, the review identified a dearth of evidence-based management protocols, underscored by a pronounced heterogeneity in treatment guidelines. Conclusions: The literature is replete with analyses on anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections; however, there exists a glaring scarcity of exhaustive research on other postoperative complications. This review emphasizes the pressing need for uniform treatment guidelines and spotlights areas in dire need of further research, aiming at the comprehensive enhancement of patient outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageartificial intelligencecolorectal cancerimproved surgical managementpostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID39544841
PMCPMC11560852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.