ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery and its influence on hemodynamics, inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data of 80 patients who underwent epidural anesthesia at Jinan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022. The patients treated with propofol and routine postoperative wound treatment were assigned into a control group, while the patients treated with dexmedetomidine and nano-silver polyurethane dressing were classified into an observation group. The baseline data, anesthesia effect, intraoperative basic indexes, hemodynamics indexes, postoperative recovery indexes, recovery quality, inflammatory response and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe observation group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes (97.5%) compared to the control group (85.0%) (P < 0.05). The anesthesia recovery time of the observation group was notably longer than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The Ramsay score and levels of mean arterial pressure in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while the heart rate level was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The wound healing time, dressing change times and visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the 40-items quality of recovery score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (both P < 0.05). The serum IL-6, CRP and TNF-α levels in the observation group were lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.0%) (P < 0.05).
conclusionIn gynecological surgeries utilizing epidural anesthesia, dexmedetomidine minimally impacts hemodynamics and provides good anesthesia and sedation with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions. Nano-silver polyurethane dressing accelerates wound healing, reduces the dressing changes, alleviates the inflammatory response, and reduces the occurrence of wound infection, thereby enhancing postoperative recovery quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.