Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544811›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

The antimicrobial effect of

Maliha Khalid Khan, Imran Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Omer Iqbal, Emad M Eed, Aftab Ahmad, Muhammad Naeem, Hafiza Tuba Ashiq, Nayla Munawar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maliha Khalid KhanDepartment of Pathobiology and Biomedical Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture Multan 60000, Pakistan.
Imran Ahmad KhanDepartment of Pharmacy, MNS University of Agriculture Multan 60000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Omer IqbalCollege of Marine Science and Bioengineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology Qingdao 266042, China.
Emad M EedDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Aftab AhmadBiochemistry/Center for Advanced Studies in Agriculture and Food Security (CAS-AFS), University of Agriculture Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.
Muhammad NaeemCollege of Life Science, Hebei Normal University Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei, China.
Hafiza Tuba AshiqDepartment of Pathobiology and Biomedical Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture Multan 60000, Pakistan.
Nayla MunawarDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University Al-Ain 15551, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective

methods

resultAfter the ninth post-wounding day, the wound contractions recorded in each group were group-1 (83.11%), group-2 (19.21%), group-3 (91.01%), group-4 (100%), and group-5 (16.55%) similarly less cytoarchitectural damage and more promising cellular repair were observed in both decoctions treated groups as compared to standard and control. A less exaggerated WBC profile was recorded in decoction-treated groups compared to standard and control, while decoction showed significant antibacterial potential even against the resistance strains of standard antibiotics. Decoction showed no dermal and oral toxicity in the animals tested.

conclusionDecoction of

Indexed as

Allium sativumantimicrobialCurcuma longaPovidone-iodinewound

Identifiers

PMID39544811
PMCPMC11558388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.