ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effect of nursing risk management on perioperative care in cardiovascular interventional catheterization rooms.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effect of nursing risk management in cardiovascular interventional catheterization rooms, reduce perioperative complications and enhance treatment outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study included 60 patients who underwent cardiovascular interventional surgery at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2023 to January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the nursing approach received. The observation group (n=32) received nursing risk management intervention, while the control group (n=28) received routine nursing care. Outcomes compared included psychological status, nursing satisfaction, postoperative complications, and general clinical information.
resultsBoth groups showed significant reductions in Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, with the observation group achieving lower scores post-intervention (both P<0.05). Nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group (93.75%) compared to the control group (78.57%) (P<0.05). The rate of postoperative complications was lower in the observation group (6.2% vs. 17.9%) (P=0.047). Multiple regression analysis identified urinary retention (P=0.007) and nursing risk management (P<0.001) as independent factors influencing patients' psychological status.
conclusionNursing risk management in cardiovascular interventional catheterization rooms can reduce anxiety and depression, decrease postoperative complications, and improve nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.