ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction for postoperative bleeding in early esophageal cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical value of predicting bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- The application effect of rubber band traction assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify the risk factors for postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal cancer.
methodsThe clinical data of 258 patients with early esophageal cancer who received ESD in Jiujiang Number One People's Hospital from April 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with or without postoperative bleeding were included into a bleeding group and a control group, respectively, and general information with statistically significant difference between the two groups was included in the multivariate logistic regression model to screen the risk factors for postoperative bleeding in the patients. The risk factors were then used to construct a nomogram prediction model for postoperative bleeding, and internal (training set) and external (validation set) validation was performed.
results(1) The incidence of post-ESD bleeding was 12.02% in the 258 patients with early esophageal cancer. (2) History of hypertension, lesion diameter, submucosal fibrosis, C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin (ALB) were independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding after ESD in the patients (
conclusionHypertension history, lesion diameter, submucosal fibrosis, CRP, and ALB are risk factors for postoperative bleeding in patients with early esophageal cancer undergoing ESD. The nomograms established based on these factors has good predictive value for postoperative bleeding in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.