Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544774›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Finite element comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone materials for mandibular defect reconstruction.

Liwen Chen, Liping Gao, Haipo Cui, Xudong Guo, Jing Han, Jiannan Liu, Yuan Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liwen ChenShanghai Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093, China.
Liping GaoShanghai Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093, China.
Haipo CuiShanghai Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093, China.
Xudong GuoShanghai Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai 200093, China.
Jing HanDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200023, China.
Jiannan LiuDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200023, China.
Yuan YaoShanghai Songyu Medical Device Co., Ltd. Shanghai 201501, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the biomechanical performance of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium alloys in a base-type fixation system for mandibular defect reconstruction following partial resection due to tumors, trauma, or cancer, using finite element analysis.

methodsFinite element analysis was conducted to simulate a fixation system made from titanium alloys, including pure titanium (Ti), Ti6Al4V (TC4), and Ti35Nb7Zr5Ta (TiNb), as well as PEEK materials, including unmodified PEEK, glass fiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR-PEEK), and carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK). The biomechanical performance of these materials was compared.

resultsThe PEEK-based fixation systems generated higher maximum stress on the mandible and fibula compared to the titanium alloy systems, particularly with the GFR-PEEK fixation system. When loaded in the anterior region, the maximum stress on the mandible exceeded its yield strength, indicating that both PEEK and GFR-PEEK are unsuitable for mandibular defect repair. CFR-PEEK, however, exhibited more favorable stress distribution, making it a better candidate for these applications.

conclusionProlonged low stress on the bone may result in resorption or degeneration. Among the materials analyzed, CFR-PEEK demonstrated the most stable performance, suggesting it as the optimal choice for mandibular defect repair in fixation systems.

Indexed as

finite element analysisfixation systemMandibular reconstructionpolyetheretherketonetitanium alloy

Identifiers

PMID39544774
PMCPMC11558410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.